This is fine. He should stick to what excites him. The sad
thing is that even his skills at entertainment are declining. "War
Horse" is an effective entertainment, but you can predict every move it's
going to make. It operates within such a conventional formula that there's
little real excitement.
The story focuses on a lower-class English teenager (played
fairly well by newcomer Jeremy Irvine) who develops a deep relationship with a
young thoroughbred that his father buys at auction. Quite early in the film,
World War I breaks out (1914), and the family is forced to sell the horse to
the British Army. The bulk of the film follows the horse's travails on various
front lines.
The boy eventually enlists in the Army. The drama then moves
to the question of whether the horse and boy are going to find each other on
the battlefield. Along the way, the horse encounters an array of German,
French, and English folk, some of whom go out of their way to protect the
horse. The screenplay bends over backwards to portray the Germans as kind and
humane. This was a nice touch, but not really surprising anymore. American and
British storywriters have been doing this for about 20 years now.
It is all lovely to behold, and one cannot help but get
carried up by it. I do believe that animals and humans can share deep,
surprising, and authentic bonds. But "War Horse" never moves beyond
the predictable. It ultimately coddles its audience and never gives it much to
think about. After you've wiped away the tears and felt the warm afterglow
dissipate, you go back to the challenging world, not having grown at all.
"War Horse" is just a very good Hallmark greeting card.
No comments:
Post a Comment